Rose Capdevila

702 citations
34 papers · 410 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Rose Capdevila

29 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Rose Capdevila
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • General Psychology 18
  • Gender Studies 66
  • Communication 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 182
  • Clinical Psychology 67
Replace Michael Schröter with:
Michael Schröter Germany
Allan Johnson United Kingdom
Rutledge M. Dennis United States
Philip Manning United States
Robert Bly
Mary Kay Thompson Tetreault United States
John W. Petras United States
W. Peter Archibald Canada
Warren Handel United States
Rose Capdevila relative to Michael Schröter Germany Michael Schröter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Michael Schröter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Capdevila

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Capdevila's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Capdevila with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Capdevila more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Capdevila

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Capdevila. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Capdevila. The network helps show where Rose Capdevila may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Rose Capdevila, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose Capdevila Line = papers co-authored together Rose Capdevila links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199972
2 200770
3 201963
4 200535
5 201027
6 199815
7 201113
8 200913
9 201412
10 201111
11 201410
12 202010
13 20229
14 20207
15 20106
16 20036
17 20035
18 20094
19 20054
20 20153

About Rose Capdevila

Rose Capdevila is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and General Psychology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Q Methodology Applications (6 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (18 citations), Gender Studies (66 citations), Communication (41 citations), Sociology and Political Science (182 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Rose Capdevila has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Brown, Jane Callaghan, Lisa Lazard, Sally Johnson, Abigail Locke, Jennifer Wallis, Jan Burns, S.D.M. Brown, Jeanne Marecek and Susan Corr. Their work appears in journals such as Feminism & Psychology, The Sociological Review, Psychology of Women Quarterly, Qualitative Research in Psychology and New Media & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact