Feminism & Psychology

1.4k papers and 20.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Feminism & Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 20.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Feminism & Psychology usually cover Gender Studies (501 papers), Sociology and Political Science (483 papers) and Clinical Psychology (268 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (216 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (209 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Feminism & Psychology are Celia Kitzinger, Margaret Wetherell, Rosalind Gill, Nigel Edley, Carol Gilligan, Lyn Mikel Brown, Melanie A. Beres, Jane M. Ussher, Carol Tavris and Sue Wilkinson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Feminism & Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Feminism & Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Feminism & Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Feminism & Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Feminism & Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Feminism & Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feminism & Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025