Rose Broad

465 citations
26 papers · 235 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Rose Broad

22 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Rose Broad
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 199
  • Clinical Psychology 50
  • Epidemiology 71
  • Strategy and Management 26
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 20
Replace Gert Vermeulen with:
Gert Vermeulen Slovenia
Janie A. Chuang United States
Edward J. Schauer United States
Stephanie Fahy United States
Reino Sirén Finland
Elizabeth M. Wheaton United States
Cyrille Fijnaut Japan
Conny Rijken Netherlands
Andrea Di Nicola Italy
Paul Ponsaers Belgium
Rose Broad relative to Gert Vermeulen Slovenia Gert Vermeulen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Gert Vermeulen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Broad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Broad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Broad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Broad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Broad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Broad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Broad. The network helps show where Rose Broad may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Rose Broad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose Broad Line = papers co-authored together Rose Broad links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201857
2 201756
3 201540
4 201113
5 202213
6 20228
7 20225
8 20245
9
Corporate Failures to Prevent Serious and Organised Crimes: Foregrounding the ‘Organisational’ Component
20185
10 20204
11 20204
12 20203
13 20223
14 20223
15 20183
16 20193
17
Mapping the Contours of Modern Slavery in Greater Manchester
20173
18 20242
19 20151
20 20251

About Rose Broad

Rose Broad is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, General Health Professions and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 26 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (15 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (11 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (2 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers) and Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (199 citations), Clinical Psychology (50 citations), Epidemiology (71 citations), Strategy and Management (26 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (20 citations). Rose Broad has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and China. Frequent co-authors include David Gadd, Nick Turnbull, Jon Spencer, Nicholas Lord, Jay S. Albanese, Shadd Maruna, Elisa Bellotti, Caroline S. Miles, Jon Davies and Klaus von Lampe. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology & Criminal Justice, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Journal of Human Trafficking, The British Journal of Criminology and Probation Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact