Jon Spencer

652 citations
33 papers · 422 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Spencer

30 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers

Jon Spencer
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Clinical Psychology 129
  • Sociology and Political Science 271
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 53
  • Gender Studies 33
  • Food Science 49
Replace Jerry Daday with:
Jerry Daday United States
Meghan E. Hollis United States
Meghan E. Hollis-Peel United States
Kevin Chen United States
Álvaro P. Pires Canada
Zarina Vakhitova Australia
Stefan Harrendorf Germany
George J. Bryjak United States
Brigitte Bouhours Australia
Emma‐Jayne Abbots United Kingdom
Jon Spencer relative to Jerry Daday United States Jerry Daday's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Jerry Daday · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Spencer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Spencer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Spencer. The network helps show where Jon Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jon Spencer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Spencer Line = papers co-authored together Jon Spencer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200871
2 201756
3 200745
4 201742
5 200738
6 200834
7 201723
8 201113
9 201611
10 201810
11 200510
12
Getting problem drug users (back) into employment: part two
200810
13 20169
14 20188
15 20175
16 19934
17
Barriers and opportunities to employment for sex offenders
20044
18 20064
19 20213
20 20203

About Jon Spencer

Jon Spencer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Computer Networks and Communications and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (9 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (5 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (3 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (129 citations), Sociology and Political Science (271 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (53 citations), Gender Studies (33 citations) and Food Science (49 citations). Jon Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Deakin, Nicholas Lord, Steven Brown, Kevin J. Brown, Steven J. Brown, Jay S. Albanese, Elisa Bellotti, Juanjo Medina, Rose Broad and T.J. Willink. Their work appears in journals such as The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Probation Journal, European Journal of Criminology, Criminology & Criminal Justice and Crime Law and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact