Jon Spencer

656 citations
31 papers · 443 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Spencer

28 papers receiving 407 citations

Peers

Jon Spencer
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 135
  • Sociology and Political Science 294
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
  • Gender Studies 40
  • Food Science 55
Replace Meghan E. Hollis with:
Meghan E. Hollis United States
Jerry K. Daday United States
Andrew G. Reiter United States
Frank E. Hagan United States
Zarina Vakhitova Australia
George J. Bryjak United States
Toine Spapens Netherlands
Roberta Raffaetà Italy
Michael G. Cherbonneau United States
Edwin W. Kruisbergen Netherlands
Jon Spencer relative to Meghan E. Hollis United States Meghan E. Hollis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Meghan E. Hollis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Spencer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Spencer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Spencer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Spencer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Spencer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Spencer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Spencer. The network helps show where Jon Spencer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jon Spencer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Spencer Line = papers co-authored together Jon Spencer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200872
2 201760
3 200749
4 201744
5 200742
6 200834
7 201727
8 201119
9 201613
10 200511
11 201810
12 201610
13 20189
14 20175
15 19934
16 20174
17 20154
18 20204
19 19953
20 19993

About Jon Spencer

Jon Spencer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Computer Networks and Communications and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (9 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (8 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (4 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers) and Caching and Content Delivery (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (135 citations), Sociology and Political Science (294 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (59 citations), Gender Studies (40 citations) and Food Science (55 citations). Jon Spencer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Deakin, Nicholas J Lord, Steven Brown, Kevin J. Brown, Rose Broad, Elisa Bellotti, Steven J. Brown, Juanjo Medina, Jay S. Albanese and Tricia J. Willink. Their work appears in journals such as The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, Crime Law and Social Change, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Probation Journal and Crime Prevention and Community Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact