Roger Ford

31 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Roger Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • General Engineering 15
  • Mechanical Engineering 172
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 97
  • Mechanics of Materials 97
Replace Xin Xin with:
Xin Xin China
Shuo Xu China
Ziwei Luo China
Yinuo Han United Kingdom
E. Álvarez Venezuela
Harshkumar Patel India
Martin Riedler Austria
Annan Zhang China
Florian König Germany
Andrew Walton United Kingdom
Roger Ford relative to Xin Xin China Xin Xin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Xin Xin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roger Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roger Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roger Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roger Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roger Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roger Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roger Ford. The network helps show where Roger Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Roger Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roger Ford Line = papers co-authored together Roger Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200468
2 197459
3 197838
4 200736
5 200633
6 200621
7
Patent Invalidity versus Noninfringement
201319
8
Privacy and Accountability in Black-Box Medicine
201618
9 200716
10 197411
11
PAVEMENT PRESERVATION TECHNOLOGY IN FRANCE, SOUTH AFRICA, AND AUSTRALIA
20029
12 19787
13 19876
14 20016
15 19925
16
The morality of biotech patents: differing legal obligations in Europe?
19975
17 19924
18
RAILTRACK "INVESTMENT" - MONEY INTO A BLACK HOLE?
20013
19 19803
20 20023

About Roger Ford

Roger Ford is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Computational Mechanics and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 388 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Railway Engineering and Dynamics (6 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (5 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (3 papers), Lubricants and Their Additives (3 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Transport and Economic Policies (2 papers), Spam and Phishing Detection (2 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Engineering (15 citations), Mechanical Engineering (172 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (97 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (97 citations). Roger Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anthony E. Smart, C. A. Foord, David Thompson, T.P. Waters, D. Hanson, Robert B. Randall, Janet Paulsen, Brian Bates, Lin Zhang and Jeremy Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Wear, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Journal of Sound and Vibration and Cornell law review/˜The œCornell law quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact