Roderick E. McGrew

500 citations
18 papers · 246 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Roderick E. McGrew

14 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers

Roderick E. McGrew
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Political Science and International Relations 59
  • History 18
  • Law 15
  • Sociology and Political Science 67
Replace Stanley Chodorow with:
Stanley Chodorow United States
Barón United States
Pope Benedict Xvi
David Ray Papke United States
Nicholas Hudson Canada
Philipp Sarasin Switzerland
Stephen Nathanson United States
Mary Gibson United States
Ariane Chebel d’Appollonia Netherlands
Judith Rowbotham United Kingdom
Roderick E. McGrew relative to Stanley Chodorow United States Stanley Chodorow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stanley Chodorow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roderick E. McGrew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roderick E. McGrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roderick E. McGrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roderick E. McGrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roderick E. McGrew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roderick E. McGrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roderick E. McGrew. The network helps show where Roderick E. McGrew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Roderick E. McGrew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roderick E. McGrew Line = papers co-authored together Roderick E. McGrew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 195889
2 198663
3 198552
4 198119
5 19925
6 19673
7 19683
8 19742
9 19742
10 19922
11 19641
12 19681
13 20011
14 19931
15 19931
16 19741
17 19580
18 19650

About Roderick E. McGrew

Roderick E. McGrew is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science and Museology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (3 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (2 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (1 paper), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (1 paper), Soviet and Russian History (1 paper), Central European and Russian historical studies (1 paper) and Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations), Political Science and International Relations (59 citations), History (18 citations), Law (15 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (67 citations). Roderick E. McGrew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Franz Neumann, Klaus von Beyme, Paul Dukes, C. M. Foust, Marc Raeff, John T. Alexander and Carol S. Leonard. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Slavic Review, History of European Ideas, Ab imperio and Harvard Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact