Roberto Schreiber

671 citations
53 papers · 421 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Roberto Schreiber

48 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Roberto Schreiber
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cancer Research 96
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 59
  • Hematology 22
  • Immunology 37
Replace Shifang Ding with:
Shifang Ding China
Qing Feng China
Yang Dezhai China
Nynke E. Hahn Netherlands
Kenichi Koga Japan
Mingwei Jin China
Jaw-Wen Chen Taiwan
Manjeet K. Bolla United Kingdom
Britt Opdebeeck Belgium
In Jai Kim South Korea
Roberto Schreiber relative to Shifang Ding China Shifang Ding's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Shifang Ding · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Schreiber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Schreiber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Schreiber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Schreiber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Schreiber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Schreiber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Schreiber. The network helps show where Roberto Schreiber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Schreiber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Schreiber Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Schreiber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201134
2 201633
3 201331
4 201030
5 201128
6 201025
7 201821
8 201019
9 201115
10 201315
11 201211
12 201510
13 201010
14 20139
15 20139
16 20238
17 20038
18 20248
19 20227
20 20147

About Roberto Schreiber

Roberto Schreiber is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Immunology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MicroRNA in disease regulation (7 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (5 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (4 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (3 papers) and Circular RNAs in diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (96 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (99 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (59 citations), Hematology (22 citations) and Immunology (37 citations). Roberto Schreiber has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wilson Nadruz, José R. Matos‐Souza, José E. Tanus‐Santos, Riccardo Lacchini, Marcelo R. Luizon, John F. McDonald, Roman Mezencev, Kleber G. Franchini, Andrei C. Spósito and José Irineu Gorla. Their work appears in journals such as Clinica Chimica Acta, American Journal of Hypertension, European Heart Journal, Journal of Human Hypertension and Journal of Neurotrauma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact