Roberto Lio

17 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Roberto Lio
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Microbiology 8
  • Gastroenterology 20
  • Epidemiology 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 58
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
Replace Alexandra Coomans de Brachène with:
Alexandra Coomans de Brachène Belgium
Ping‐Fang Hu China
Chunlai Zuo United States
Alan Koterba United States
Kyohei Ariake Japan
Shungo Hiroyasu Japan
Yi Liao China
Mika Wakabayashi Japan
Suocheng Chen China
G Feifel Germany
Roberto Lio relative to Alexandra Coomans de Brachène Belgium Alexandra Coomans de Brachène's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Alexandra Coomans de Brachène · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberto Lio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberto Lio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberto Lio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberto Lio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberto Lio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberto Lio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberto Lio. The network helps show where Roberto Lio may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Roberto Lio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberto Lio Line = papers co-authored together Roberto Lio links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2009111
2 199349
3 198734
4 198725
5 198922
6 199321
7 198717
8 199216
9 199214
10
Quantitatively evaluated ultrastructural findings can add to the differential diagnosis between keratoacanthoma and well differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.
19928
11 19888
12
Splenic cyst lined with mucus-secreting epithelium. Evidence of an intestinal origin.
19865
13 19933
14 20172
15 20142
16 19941
17 19881

About Roberto Lio

Roberto Lio is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Dermatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (3 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (2 papers), Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research (2 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (2 papers), Digestive system and related health (2 papers) and Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (8 citations), Gastroenterology (20 citations), Epidemiology (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (58 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations). Roberto Lio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Pietro Luzi, Clelia Miracco, Piero Tosi, Paolo Barbini, Rosa Santopietro, Gabriele Cevenini, M. Biagioli, Alessandro Franchi, Daniele Moretti and Marzia Toscano. Their work appears in journals such as Human Pathology, American Journal of Dermatopathology, The Journal of Pathology, European Journal of Cancer and Journal of Investigative Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact