Roberta Kestenbaum

15 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Roberta Kestenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 458
  • Social Psychology 442
  • Clinical Psychology 424
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 379
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 253
Replace Elinor W. Ames with:
Elinor W. Ames Canada
Ina Č. Užgiris United States
Richard B. Kearsley United States
Burton L. White United States
Janette B. Benson United States
Marie‐Germaine Pêcheux France
Janet F. Fletcher Australia
Nancy Angrist Myers United States
Melissa Wechsler Clearfield United States
Moritz M. Daum Switzerland
Roberta Kestenbaum relative to Elinor W. Ames Canada Elinor W. Ames's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Elinor W. Ames · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roberta Kestenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roberta Kestenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roberta Kestenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roberta Kestenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roberta Kestenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roberta Kestenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roberta Kestenbaum. The network helps show where Roberta Kestenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Roberta Kestenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roberta Kestenbaum Line = papers co-authored together Roberta Kestenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1995310
2 1990203
3 1989185
4 1990120
5 1990113
6 199281
7
Les origines du concept d'objet
198664
8 198763
9 198935
10 199235
11 198720
12 198713
13 19894
14 19923
15 19881
16 20130

About Roberta Kestenbaum

Roberta Kestenbaum is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper) and Infant Health and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (458 citations), Social Psychology (442 citations), Clinical Psychology (424 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (379 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (253 citations). Roberta Kestenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth S. Spelke, Charles Nelson, Daniel J. Simons, Megan R. Gunnar, Sarah Lang, Sarah C. Mangelsdorf, Ellen A. Farber, L. Alan Sroufe, Claes von Hofsten and Henry Gleitman. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychology, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Child Development, British Journal of Developmental Psychology and Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact