Robert W. Covert

530 citations
18 papers · 348 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Robert W. Covert

16 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Robert W. Covert
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Applied Psychology 16
  • Information Systems and Management 22
  • Education 78
  • Research and Theory 2
  • Social Psychology 46
Replace M. Scott Myers with:
M. Scott Myers United States
John M. Kennedy United States
Ursula T. Wright United States
Elijah Cody Howe United States
F. Lane United States
Dirk Sikkel Netherlands
Howard T. Tokunaga United States
Dagmar Krebs Germany
Marek Fuchs Germany
Jason L. Meyers United States
Robert W. Covert relative to M. Scott Myers United States M. Scott Myers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Scott Myers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Covert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Covert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Covert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Covert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Covert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Covert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Covert. The network helps show where Robert W. Covert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Covert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Covert Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Covert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Designing and Constructing Instruments for Social Research and Evaluation
2007295
2 19769
3 19739
4 19757
5 19954
6 19754
7 19844
8 19883
9 19712
10 19802
11 19722
12 19741
13 19881
14
The Joint Dissemination Review Panel: Can Approved Submittals Be Distinguished from the Rejections?.
19811
15 19871
16 19871
17 19731
18 19901

About Robert W. Covert

Robert W. Covert is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Occupational Therapy, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), African Education and Politics (1 paper), Infant Development and Preterm Care (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper), Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper) and Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (16 citations), Information Systems and Management (22 citations), Education (78 citations), Research and Theory (2 citations) and Social Psychology (46 citations). Robert W. Covert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and France. Frequent co-authors include David Colton, Andrew G. D. Bean, Norman M. Chansky, Joan L. Buttram, Emanuel J. Mason, Stephen Wolk, Wei Fang, James P. Nugent, Richard J. Light and Howard S. Bloom. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Journal of Teacher Education, Public Administration Review, Evaluation Practice and New Directions for Program Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact