Robert W. Chen

75 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Robert W. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 510
  • Genetics 183
  • Oncology 458
  • Immunology 212
  • Dermatology 82
Replace Kim Last with:
Kim Last United Kingdom
M Krámer Netherlands
Jeffrey Lin United States
Răzvan Popescu Switzerland
Darrin M. Beaupre United States
Patrik Edén Sweden
Michael Baudis Switzerland
Angelica Fasolo Italy
L Rhoda Molife United Kingdom
Jessie J. Hsu United States
Robert W. Chen relative to Kim Last United Kingdom Kim Last's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kim Last · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Chen. The network helps show where Robert W. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008159
2 2014128
3 201659
4 201849
5 199748
6 201647
7 202036
8 201633
9 198533
10 201928
11 201828
12 201226
13 201919
14 201117
15 201817
16 201915
17 201615
18 202114
19 201114
20 201813

About Robert W. Chen

Robert W. Chen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Immunology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (44 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (22 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (12 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (11 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (6 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (6 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (5 papers) and Economic theories and models (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (510 citations), Genetics (183 citations), Oncology (458 citations), Immunology (212 citations) and Dermatology (82 citations). Robert W. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Michelle A. Fanale, L. A. Shepp, Nancy L. Bartlett, William A. Robinson, Lynne Bemis, Carol M. Amato, Diane K. Birks, Han Myint, Andres Forero‐Torres and S. Gail Eckhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Applied Probability, Advances in Applied Probability and SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact