Robert W. Button

568 citations
11 papers · 413 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Physiology top 10%
    • Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
    • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy

Papers in

Robert W. Button

10 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Robert W. Button
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Physiology 37
  • Epidemiology 196
  • Cell Biology 65
  • Neurology 42
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 9
Replace Cheryl L. Meyerkord with:
Cheryl L. Meyerkord United States
Ki Woon Sung South Korea
Su Ran Mun South Korea
Fatima Zahra Chakrama France
Qingzhou Chen China
Mary Grace Lin United States
Ka Ruan China
Lanjun Xu China
Léa P. Wilhelm United Kingdom
Longgui Chen United States
Robert W. Button relative to Cheryl L. Meyerkord United States Cheryl L. Meyerkord's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Cheryl L. Meyerkord · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Button

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Button's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Button with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Button more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Button

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Button. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Button. The network helps show where Robert W. Button may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Button, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Button Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Button links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2017141
2 201986
3 201572
4 201450
5 201633
6 202111
7 19648
8 20195
9 20183
10 20123
11 20121

About Robert W. Button

Robert W. Button is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Epidemiology, Physiology, Clinical Psychology and Immunology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (6 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (3 papers), Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (2 papers), Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (2 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (2 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1 paper), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper) and Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (37 citations), Epidemiology (196 citations), Cell Biology (65 citations), Neurology (42 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations). Robert W. Button has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Shouqing Luo, Clemens Oliver Hanemann, Sheridan L. Roberts, Thea L. Willis, David Chaim Rubinsztein, Bing Ren Hu, Tracey L. Evans, Yi Yang, Emanuela Ercolano and Boxun Lu. Their work appears in journals such as Oncotarget, Neuroscience Bulletin, Nature Communications, Human Molecular Genetics and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact