Robert W. Block

13 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Robert W. Block
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 146
  • Emergency Medicine 59
  • Clinical Psychology 101
  • General Health Professions 58
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 29
Replace Kim Cheung with:
Kim Cheung United States
Donna Rosenberg United States
Celeste R. Wilson United States
Paula Mazur United States
Vanessa Tempest United Kingdom
Sandeep K. Narang United States
Norman S. Ellerstein United States
Cecelia I. Roscigno United States
Patricia R. Roby United States
Amir Halevy United States
Robert W. Block relative to Kim Cheung United States Kim Cheung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Kim Cheung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Block. The network helps show where Robert W. Block may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert W. Block, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert W. Block Line = papers co-authored together Robert W. Block links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200569
2 200663
3 200261
4
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect and Committee on Community Health Services: Investigation and review of unexpected infant and child deaths.
199327
5 201318
6 199917
7
Outreach education: a possible preventer of teenage pregnancy.
19808
8 19817
9
Facilities and Equipment for Care of Pediatric Patients in a Community Hospital.
19986
10 20154
11 19862
12 20121
13 20131

About Robert W. Block

Robert W. Block is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Speech and Hearing and Emergency Medicine, having authored 13 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Child Abuse and Related Trauma (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (1 paper) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (146 citations), Emergency Medicine (59 citations), Clinical Psychology (101 citations), General Health Professions (58 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations). Robert W. Block has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nancy F. Krebs, Vincent J. Palusci, Kent P. Hymel, Carole Jenny, Richard L. Bucciarelli, F. Bruder Stapleton, Susan L. Furth, Alan R. Cohen, Benard P. Dreyer and Charles F. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Pediatrics, PEDIATRICS, The Journal of Pediatrics, Child Maltreatment and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact