Robert Tomáš

463 citations
10 papers · 313 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 3
    • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis 3

Robert Tomáš

10 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Robert Tomáš
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Microbiology 33
  • Molecular Medicine 20
  • Oncology 95
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 67
  • Surgery 101
Replace Hasan Babazada with:
Hasan Babazada United States
Shih Che Huang United States
Miharu Ito Japan
Jianmin Sun China
Phong Dam Hieu France
Julia Dieckow Germany
Charles H. Whitaker United States
Julie A. Wolfram United States
Sarah E. Sheppard United States
P Mráz Slovakia
Robert Tomáš relative to Hasan Babazada United States Hasan Babazada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Hasan Babazada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Tomáš

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Tomáš's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Tomáš with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Tomáš more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Tomáš

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Tomáš. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Tomáš. The network helps show where Robert Tomáš may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Robert Tomáš, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Tomáš Line = papers co-authored together Robert Tomáš links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 201378
2 201668
3 200760
4 202126
5 200525
6 200920
7 202319
8 20069
9 20247
10
The relevance of the corticographic median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) phase reversal in the surgical treatment of brain tumors in central cortex.
20061

About Robert Tomáš

Robert Tomáš is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (2 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (1 paper), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (33 citations), Molecular Medicine (20 citations), Oncology (95 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (67 citations) and Surgery (101 citations). Robert Tomáš has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Pavel Haninec, Vlastimil Jindrák, Petr Dubový, Aleksi Šedo, Petr Bušek, Eva Balážiová, Martin Syrůček, E Kr̆epela, Zuzana Zemanová and Jaromír Běláček. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, Clinical Anatomy, Brain Pathology, Cancers and Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact