Robert T. Powers

2.1k citations
39 papers · 1.4k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert T. Powers

39 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert T. Powers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Algebra and Number Theory 576
  • Mathematical Physics 966
  • Geometry and Topology 270
  • Applied Mathematics 310
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 196
Replace 正一郎 境 with:
正一郎 境
Shôichirô Sakai United States
Gert Kjærgård Pedersen Denmark
Bruce Blackadar United States
Alain Guichardet France
John Roe United States
C. R. Putnam United States
Kazuhiko Aomoto Japan
Nicole Berline France
Masato Wakayama Japan
Robert T. Powers relative to 正一郎 境 正一郎 境's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×25×
正一郎 境 · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert T. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert T. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert T. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert T. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert T. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert T. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert T. Powers. The network helps show where Robert T. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Robert T. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert T. Powers Line = papers co-authored together Robert T. Powers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967207
2 1970191
3 1971187
4 197596
5 198885
6 197464
7 197459
8 197547
9
Representations of the Canonical Anticommutation Relations.
196745
10 202145
11 198742
12 197533
13 196722
14 197521
15 198918
16 197617
17 199916
18 197416
19 198215
20 199014

About Robert T. Powers

Robert T. Powers is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Operator Algebra Research (13 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (11 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (8 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (5 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (576 citations), Mathematical Physics (966 citations), Geometry and Topology (270 citations), Applied Mathematics (310 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (196 citations). Robert T. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Erling Størmer, Shôichirô Sakai, Geoffrey L. Price, David H. Sharp, Gerald A. Goldin, Eric Giza, Derek W. Robinson, Arthur Jaffe, Jeffrey M. Cohen and Sergio Doplicher. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Journal of Functional Analysis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, International Journal of Mathematics and Duke Mathematical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact