Robert Stecker

2.4k citations
96 papers · 955 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Stecker

77 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Robert Stecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Philosophy 455
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 149
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 372
  • History and Philosophy of Science 109
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 316
Replace Frank N. Sibley with:
Frank N. Sibley United Kingdom
Dominic McIver Lopes Canada
Nick Zangwill United Kingdom
Matthew Kieran United Kingdom
Malcolm Budd United Kingdom
V. A. Howard Canada
Colin Lyas Ghana
Jenefer M. Robinson United States
Colin Radford United Kingdom
Leonard Richard Lawlor United States
Robert Stecker relative to Frank N. Sibley United Kingdom Frank N. Sibley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Frank N. Sibley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stecker. The network helps show where Robert Stecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stecker Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998100
2 200397
3 199760
4 200650
5 199446
6 197341
7 198732
8 196531
9 201226
10 200526
11 201919
12 199319
13 201118
14 199617
15 199417
16 199416
17 199016
18 199716
19 200616
20 198414

About Robert Stecker

Robert Stecker is a scholar working on Philosophy, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Law, having authored 96 papers that have together received 955 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (17 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (455 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (149 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (372 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (109 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (316 citations). Robert Stecker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fred Adams, Gary Fuller, Christina L. Graves, Yuji Nishiyama, Scott Soames, Jerrold J. Katz, Stephen Davies, Peter Kivy, Joseph Margolis and Fred C. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, Analysis, Pacific philosophical quarterly and Mind & Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact