Robert Stecker

2.2k citations
97 papers · 963 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art 17
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 6
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 4
    • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 15

Robert Stecker

77 papers receiving 609 citations

Peers

Robert Stecker
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Philosophy 468
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 378
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 146
  • History and Philosophy of Science 116
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 316
Replace Frank Sibley with:
Frank Sibley United Kingdom
Dominic McIver Lopes Canada
Nick Zangwill United Kingdom
Malcolm Budd United Kingdom
Crispin Sartwell United States
Matthew Kieran United Kingdom
Noël Carroll United States
V. A. Howard United States
Jenefer Robinson United States
Colin Lyas Ghana
Robert Stecker relative to Frank Sibley United Kingdom Frank Sibley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Frank Sibley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stecker. The network helps show where Robert Stecker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Stecker Line = papers co-authored together Robert Stecker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 97 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998101
2 200395
3 199762
4 200651
5 199451
6 197338
7 198732
8 196531
9 201227
10 200527
11 199319
12 201118
13 200617
14 199417
15 199617
16 201916
17 199416
18 199016
19 199715
20 199213

About Robert Stecker

Robert Stecker is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Law, having authored 97 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (17 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (9 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (6 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (468 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (378 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (146 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (116 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (316 citations). Robert Stecker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fred Adams, G. A. Fuller, Jerrold J. Katz, Scott Soames, Yuji Nishiyama, Christina Graves, Stephen Davies, Fred C. Adams, Peter Kivy and Joseph Margolis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The British Journal of Aesthetics, Analysis, Mind & Language and Pacific philosophical quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact