Robert Snoek

15 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

Robert Snoek
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 231
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 378
  • Genetics 347
  • Molecular Biology 433
  • Cancer Research 72
Replace James L. Prescott with:
James L. Prescott United States
Lynne V. Nazareth United States
Susan Ha United States
Siu Chiu Chan United States
Mark E. Brady United Kingdom
Andréa Fournier Canada
Sónia Moniz Portugal
Olaf Hellwinkel Germany
Yi‐Rong Li United States
Ian R. Logan United Kingdom
Robert Snoek relative to James L. Prescott United States James L. Prescott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
James L. Prescott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Snoek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Snoek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Snoek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Snoek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Snoek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Snoek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Snoek. The network helps show where Robert Snoek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Snoek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Snoek Line = papers co-authored together Robert Snoek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1993283
2 1994128
3 2008114
4 200550
5 199947
6 199843
7 201041
8 199638
9 198923
10 198918
11 19939
12 19876
13 20023
14 19981
15 20091

About Robert Snoek

Robert Snoek is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Epidemiology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 805 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (8 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (4 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (2 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research (1 paper), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (231 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (378 citations), Genetics (347 citations), Molecular Biology (433 citations) and Cancer Research (72 citations). Robert Snoek has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Paul S. Rennie, Nicholas Bruchovsky, Robert J. Matusik, Helen Cheng, Patricia Sheppard, Martin Gleave, Latif A. Wafa, Ladan Fazli, Chawnshang Chang and Peter A. Cattini. Their work appears in journals such as The Prostate, Molecular Endocrinology, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Infection and Immunity and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact