Robert Schmiel

637 citations
17 papers · 234 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 13
    • Historical and Literary Studies 1
    • Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 7

Robert Schmiel

15 papers receiving 121 citations

Peers

Robert Schmiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Classics 67
  • Anthropology 168
  • Archeology 100
  • Religious studies 21
  • Philosophy 36
Replace James Diggle with:
James Diggle United States
C. Robert Phillips United States
Stephen Scully United States
Eva Stehle United States
Cecil W. Wooten United States
G. M. Sifakis Greece
Giambattista D’Alessio Italy
Norman Austin
Manuel Fernández-Galiano United States
James H. Dee
Robert Schmiel relative to James Diggle United States James Diggle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
James Diggle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Schmiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Schmiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Schmiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Schmiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Schmiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Schmiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Schmiel. The network helps show where Robert Schmiel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Robert Schmiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Schmiel Line = papers co-authored together Robert Schmiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 198655
2 199654
3 199152
4 197620
5 199917
6 197810
7 19909
8 19723
9 19863
10 19872
11 19932
12 19712
13 19981
14 19981
15 19811
16 19871
17 19811

About Robert Schmiel

Robert Schmiel is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (2 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (67 citations), Anthropology (168 citations), Archeology (100 citations), Religious studies (21 citations) and Philosophy (36 citations). Robert Schmiel has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Graham Zanker, Callimachus, M. D. Usher and Peter Bing. Their work appears in journals such as Phoenix, The American Journal of Philology, Classical Philology, Mnemosyne and Rheinisches Museum für Philologie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact