C. Robert Phillips
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Byzantine Studies and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 5
- History 4
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 2
- Classical Studies and Legal History 2
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
- Co-authors
- Peter White (1 shared paper)Steven H. Lonsdale (1 shared paper)Marcel Simon (1 shared paper)Michael Attyah Flower (1 shared paper)Robert W. Ackerman (1 shared paper)Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve (1 shared paper)WILLIAM MUSGRAVE CALDER III (2 shared papers)Ward W. Briggs (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical World (5 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Phoenix (1 paper)Method & Theory in the Study of Religion (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. Robert Phillips
9 papers receiving 95 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Anthropology 164
- Classics 49
- Archeology 80
- Religious studies 33
- Philosophy 29
Countries citing papers authored by C. Robert Phillips
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Robert Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Robert Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Robert Phillips more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Robert Phillips
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Robert Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Robert Phillips. The network helps show where C. Robert Phillips may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside C. Robert Phillips, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 83 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 47 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 32 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 0 |
About C. Robert Phillips
C. Robert Phillips is a scholar working on Anthropology, History, Religious studies, Archeology and Philosophy, having authored 11 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (2 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (1 paper) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (164 citations), Classics (49 citations), Archeology (80 citations), Religious studies (33 citations) and Philosophy (29 citations). C. Robert Phillips has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter White, Steven H. Lonsdale, Marcel Simon, Michael Attyah Flower, Robert W. Ackerman, Basil Lanneau Gildersleeve, WILLIAM MUSGRAVE CALDER III, Ward W. Briggs, John Preston Harris and Wolfgang Kullmann. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, The American Historical Review, The American Journal of Philology, Phoenix and Method & Theory in the Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.