Robert R. King

3.4k citations
57 papers · 1.3k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Robert R. King

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert R. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Instrumentation 124
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 507
  • Oceanography 320
  • General Decision Sciences 30
  • Finance 151
Replace David Gordon with:
David Gordon United States
E. T. Olsen United States
Stefan A. Buehler Germany
Sallie L. Baliunas United States
James A. Gardner United States
Eric Wolf United States
Vijay K. Narayanan United States
Richard A Booth United Kingdom
Philip Davis United States
Robert R. King relative to David Gordon United States David Gordon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30.2×
David Gordon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert R. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert R. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert R. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert R. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert R. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert R. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert R. King. The network helps show where Robert R. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert R. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert R. King Line = papers co-authored together Robert R. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Robustness of Bubbles and Crashes in Experimental Stock Markets
1993189
2 201499
3 201592
4 201771
5 201963
6 201262
7 201159
8 200949
9 201145
10 201044
11 201244
12 201134
13 198133
14 201932
15 197332
16 201730
17 201829
18 201926
19 201823
20 197223

About Robert R. King

Robert R. King is a scholar working on Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science and Instrumentation, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (18 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (17 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (15 papers), Climate variability and models (14 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (8 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (7 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers) and Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (124 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (507 citations), Oceanography (320 citations), General Decision Sciences (30 citations) and Finance (151 citations). Robert R. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Vernon L. Smith, Arlington W. Williams, Mark Van Boening, J. Patience, Matthew Martin, M. J. McCaughrean, Daniel J. Lea, Enda O’Dea, James While and John Siddorn. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Frontiers in Marine Science, Ocean science, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society and Ocean Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact