Robert Q. Topper

531 citations
14 papers · 314 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Q. Topper

14 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Robert Q. Topper
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 99
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 170
  • Spectroscopy 52
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 32
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 16
Replace Nikesh S. Dattani with:
Nikesh S. Dattani United Kingdom
Jason Nguyen United States
Holger Dachsel Germany
R. Blumberg United States
Hiroaki Umeda Japan
Takehiro Yonehara Japan
Steven D. Schwartz United States
Elia Schneider United States
Bijoy K. Dey United States
Margaret Mandziuk United States
Robert Q. Topper relative to Nikesh S. Dattani United Kingdom Nikesh S. Dattani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Nikesh S. Dattani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Q. Topper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Q. Topper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Q. Topper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Q. Topper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Q. Topper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Q. Topper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Q. Topper. The network helps show where Robert Q. Topper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Robert Q. Topper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Q. Topper Line = papers co-authored together Robert Q. Topper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201786
2 199165
3 199138
4 199226
5 202022
6 199320
7 199217
8 201115
9 199712
10 20214
11 20164
12 20032
13 20042
14 19941

About Robert Q. Topper

Robert Q. Topper is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (5 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (4 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (3 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (2 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (2 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (2 papers) and Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (99 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (170 citations), Spectroscopy (52 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (32 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (16 citations). Robert Q. Topper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Manish Mehta, N. De Leon, Donald G. Truhlar, Elia Schneider, Mark E. Tuckerman, Qi Zhang, Isaac M. Markus, Eugene Agichtein, Leonid Grinberg and Guowei Yu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact