Robert Planqué

2.8k citations
35 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Planqué

33 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Robert Planqué
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Developmental Biology 228
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 553
  • Genetics 329
  • Insect Science 140
  • Ecology 218
Replace T. M. Schaerf with:
T. M. Schaerf Australia
Travis C. Collier United States
Daniel I. Rubenstein United States
Andrej Blejec Slovenia
Patsy Haccou Netherlands
Caro‐Beth Stewart United States
William E. Conner United States
Eran Levin Israel
Stefan Krause Germany
William L. Romey United States
Robert Planqué relative to T. M. Schaerf Australia T. M. Schaerf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
T. M. Schaerf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Planqué

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Planqué's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Planqué with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Planqué more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Planqué

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Planqué. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Planqué. The network helps show where Robert Planqué may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Planqué, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Planqué Line = papers co-authored together Robert Planqué links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014218
2 2009171
3 2009165
4 2014109
5 200893
6 200964
7 202062
8 200758
9 201950
10 201041
11
The Xeno-canto Collection and its Relation to Sound Recognition and Classification.
201530
12 202129
13 201929
14 200228
15 201324
16 202020
17 200617
18 201812
19 200712
20 200711

About Robert Planqué

Robert Planqué is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Developmental Biology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (12 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (10 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (228 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (553 citations), Genetics (329 citations), Insect Science (140 citations) and Ecology (218 citations). Robert Planqué has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nigel R. Franks, Bas Teusink, Frank J. Bruggeman, Hans Slabbekoorn, N. F. Britton, James A. R. Marshall, Tim Kovacs, Josephus Hulshof, Anna Dornhaus and Rafał Bogacz. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS Computational Biology, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Biosciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Mathematical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact