Robert Noble

40 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers

Robert Noble
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 74
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 81
  • Statistics and Probability 40
  • Environmental Engineering 69
  • Hematology 50
Replace Ameur M. Manceur with:
Ameur M. Manceur United States
Anjana Dewanji India
Mark S. Kaiser United States
Paul McShane United Kingdom
Chenhua Li China
Adam N. H. Smith New Zealand
Dong‐Yun Kim United States
Ann H. Williams United States
Qingxue Li China
Jungang Chen China
Robert Noble relative to Ameur M. Manceur United States Ameur M. Manceur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ameur M. Manceur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Noble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Noble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Noble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Noble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Noble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Noble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Noble. The network helps show where Robert Noble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Noble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Noble Line = papers co-authored together Robert Noble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021152
2 200476
3 200273
4 200556
5 200753
6 200634
7 202121
8 199920
9 200019
10 201615
11 201814
12 201012
13 200011
14 200411
15 200811
16 201310
17 200810
18 201910
19 20049
20 20218

About Robert Noble

Robert Noble is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Ecology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 43 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (7 papers), Forest ecology and management (4 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (3 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (3 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers) and Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (74 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (81 citations), Statistics and Probability (40 citations), Environmental Engineering (69 citations) and Hematology (50 citations). Robert Noble has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. John Bailer, David L. Gorchov, Bryan A. Endress, Christine M. Anderson‐Cook, Matthew W. Wheeler, M. M. Alley, Raj Khosla, James A. Doolittle, LeAnn Beanland and Tony K. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Wood and Fiber Science, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Journal of Food Science and Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact