Robert N. Pike

209 papers receiving 9.9k citations

Robert N. Pike's Hit Papers

An overview of the serpin superfamily. 2006 · 541 citations
5410+9+19Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Robert N. Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Periodontics 1.9k
  • Hematology 1.7k
  • Pharmacy 651
  • Cancer Research 1.7k
  • Parasitology 546
Replace James C. Whisstock with:
James C. Whisstock Australia
Thomas S. Kupper United States
Bernhard Homey Germany
Christopher S. Potten United Kingdom
Alejandro A. Schäffer United States
Christophe Caux France
Polly Matzinger United States
Irun R. Cohen Israel
Robert B. Sim United Kingdom
Klaus Wolff Austria
Robert N. Pike relative to James C. Whisstock Australia James C. Whisstock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×22.8×
James C. Whisstock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert N. Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert N. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert N. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert N. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert N. Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert N. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert N. Pike. The network helps show where Robert N. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert N. Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert N. Pike Line = papers co-authored together Robert N. Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 213 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The anticoagulant activation of antithrombin by heparin
Hit paper breakdown →
1997569
2
An overview of the serpin superfamily.
Hit paper breakdown →
2006541
3 2013310
4 1994310
5 2012241
6 2008223
7 1995222
8 2007198
9 2001188
10 2001185
11 2012175
12 1995169
13 1997156
14 2000155
15 1994153
16 1997144
17 1998135
18 2017123
19 1996118
20 2003117

About Robert N. Pike

Robert N. Pike is a scholar working on Hematology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Oncology and Immunology, having authored 213 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (54 papers), Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (50 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (31 papers), Complement system in diseases (21 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (21 papers), Oral microbiology and periodontitis research (20 papers), Oral and gingival health research (18 papers) and Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (1.9k citations), Hematology (1.7k citations), Pharmacy (651 citations), Cancer Research (1.7k citations) and Parasitology (546 citations). Robert N. Pike has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan Potempa, James Travis, James C. Whisstock, Lakshmi C. Wijeyewickrema, James A. Irving, Eleanor J. Mackie, Robin W. Carrell, Takahisa Imamura, Theresa H.T. Coetzer and Richard Skinner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biological Chemistry, Infection and Immunity, Molecular Immunology and Biochimie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact