Robert Most
Impact in
-
- Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Papers in
-
- Mentoring and Academic Development 1
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 2
- Co-authors
- Isabel Briggs Myers (1 shared paper)Mary H. McCaulley (1 shared paper)Eli Saltz (1 shared paper)Moshe Zeidner (2 shared papers)Kevin L. Moreland (1 shared paper)Gary J. Robertson (1 shared paper)Lorraine D. Eyde (1 shared paper)Jeffrey P. Prince (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1 paper)American Psychologist (1 paper)Journal of Career Assessment (1 paper)Applied Psychology (1 paper)Language and Speech (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Robert Most
8 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Robert Most's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 647
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 423
- Social Psychology 635
- Applied Psychology 136
- Computer Science Applications 135
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Most
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Most's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Most with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Most more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Most
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Most. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Most. The network helps show where Robert Most may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Robert Most, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator Hit paper breakdown → | 1985 | 2184 |
| 2 | 1979 | 51 | |
| 3 | Psychological Testing: An Inside View | 1992 | 33 |
| 4 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 13 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 3 |
About Robert Most
Robert Most is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper), Medical Education and Admissions (1 paper), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (1 paper), Mentoring and Academic Development (1 paper) and Personality Traits and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (647 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (423 citations), Social Psychology (635 citations), Applied Psychology (136 citations) and Computer Science Applications (135 citations). Robert Most has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Briggs Myers, Mary H. McCaulley, Eli Saltz, Moshe Zeidner, Kevin L. Moreland, Gary J. Robertson, Lorraine D. Eyde and Jeffrey P. Prince. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, American Psychologist, Journal of Career Assessment, Applied Psychology and Language and Speech.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.