Robert M. Newcomb

33 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Robert M. Newcomb
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 32
  • Space and Planetary Science 18
  • Geography, Planning and Development 48
  • Urban Studies 34
  • Archeology 44
Replace Deryck W. Holdsworth with:
Deryck W. Holdsworth United States
Clarence Fielden Jones United States
Lionella Scazzosi Italy
Primož Pipan Slovenia
Benjamin W. Stanley United States
Albina Pashkevich Sweden
Cari L. Goetcheus United States
Pierre-Antoine Landel France
Christopher Lloyd Salter United States
Jack Simmons United States
Robert M. Newcomb relative to Deryck W. Holdsworth United States Deryck W. Holdsworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Deryck W. Holdsworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Newcomb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Newcomb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Newcomb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Newcomb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Newcomb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Newcomb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Newcomb. The network helps show where Robert M. Newcomb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Newcomb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Newcomb Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Newcomb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199572
2 198152
3 199251
4 195317
5 197413
6 198111
7 197311
8 19717
9 19676
10 19816
11 19726
12 19716
13 19735
14
Employee communications in action
19614
15 20084
16 19943
17 19823
18 19693
19 20092
20 19872

About Robert M. Newcomb

Robert M. Newcomb is a scholar working on Space and Planetary Science, Anthropology, Archeology, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 39 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Photolithography Techniques (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (4 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (3 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (3 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (32 citations), Space and Planetary Science (18 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (48 citations), Urban Studies (34 citations) and Archeology (44 citations). Robert M. Newcomb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Robin A. Butlin, Donald Appleyard, Tim Unwin, Larry R. Ford, Rob Bryant, Edward Hindle, Jean‐Paul Barnes, Kenneth Robert Olwig, Norman J. G. Pounds and Ehrenfried Zschech. Their work appears in journals such as Geoforum, Geographical Review, Journal of Historical Geography, Geographical Journal and Economic Geography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact