Robert M. Ford

21 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Robert M. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 41
  • Reproductive Medicine 41
  • Neurology 69
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Surgery 112
Replace Akiko Hosokawa with:
Akiko Hosokawa Japan
Julia M. Polak United Kingdom
Şeyma Hasçalık Türkiye
Steven Bloom United Kingdom
Ana Chiesa Argentina
William D. Brubaker United States
Antonio José Cañada Martínez Spain
Atıl Yüksel Türkiye
Concepción González Spain
Shoji Satoh Japan
Robert M. Ford relative to Akiko Hosokawa Japan Akiko Hosokawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Akiko Hosokawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Ford. The network helps show where Robert M. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199454
2 199249
3 199041
4 198433
5 199021
6 198420
7 198519
8 197618
9 200114
10 198814
11 200113
12 198912
13 200112
14 197611
15 199310
16 20008
17 20028
18 20016
19 19916
20 19885

About Robert M. Ford

Robert M. Ford is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Menstrual Health and Disorders (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers) and Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (41 citations), Reproductive Medicine (41 citations), Neurology (69 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations) and Surgery (112 citations). Robert M. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alan Lam, P. M. Richardson, Joseph Stratford, J. C. Hunter, Samarthji Lal, José A. Espinosa, Rea A. Brown, John M. Esdaile, Daria A. Trojan and N.P.V. Nair. Their work appears in journals such as Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, International Journal of STD & AIDS and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact