Robert M. Durling

773 citations
13 papers · 182 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
    • Byzantine Studies and History
  • History top 2%
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 10
    • Byzantine Studies and History 1
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 7
    • Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books 1

Robert M. Durling

9 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers

Robert M. Durling
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Classics 73
  • History 86
  • Literature and Literary Theory 76
  • General Arts and Humanities 3
  • Religious studies 13
Replace John Freccero with:
John Freccero United States
Alan F. Nagel United States
Katharina M. Wilson
Giuseppe Mazzotta United States
R. T. Davies
Rosemary Woolf United Kingdom
Donald C. Baker United States
George Herbert United Kingdom
Steven Justice United States
Sears Jayne United States
Robert M. Durling relative to John Freccero United States John Freccero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
John Freccero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Durling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Durling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Durling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Durling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Durling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Durling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Durling. The network helps show where Robert M. Durling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Durling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Durling Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Durling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1
Petrarch’s Lyric Poems: The Rime Sparse and Other Lyrics
197669
2 196525
3 198120
4 197119
5 196115
6 199215
7 19547
8 19945
9 19904
10 19692
11 20031
12
Ariosto : la figura del poeta nell'epica rinascimentale
20170
13 19770

About Robert M. Durling

Robert M. Durling is a scholar working on Classics, History, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 13 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (10 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (7 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (3 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (2 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), European Cultural and National Identity (1 paper) and Italian Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (73 citations), History (86 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (76 citations), General Arts and Humanities (3 citations) and Religious studies (13 citations). Frequent co-authors include Francesco Petrarca, Ronald L. Martínez, Harry Berger, Sandra Bermann and Teodolinda Barolini. Their work appears in journals such as Comparative Literature, Revue d Etudes Augustiniennes et Patristiques, MLN, The Modern Language Review and Italica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact