Harry Berger
Impact in
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 11
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- History 10
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 7
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth Heale (1 shared paper)Peter Erickson (1 shared paper)David Schalkwyk (1 shared paper)Robert M. Durling (1 shared paper)Stanton B. Garner (1 shared paper)Christopher Braider (1 shared paper)Carolyn Cordery (1 shared paper)Karen Smith (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Representations (7 papers)Shakespeare Quarterly (6 papers)English Literary Renaissance (4 papers)ELH (4 papers)Comparative drama (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Harry Berger
41 papers receiving 147 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 63
- Literature and Literary Theory 137
- Classics 33
- Museology 26
- History 62
Countries citing papers authored by Harry Berger
This map shows the geographic impact of Harry Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harry Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harry Berger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harry Berger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harry Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harry Berger. The network helps show where Harry Berger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Harry Berger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1961 | 46 | |
| 2 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 28 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1961 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1987 | 15 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 19 | Spenser : a collection of critical essays | 1968 | 4 |
| 20 | 1982 | 4 |
About Harry Berger
Harry Berger is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science and Classics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (11 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (7 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (6 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (63 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (137 citations), Classics (33 citations), Museology (26 citations) and History (62 citations). Harry Berger has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Heale, Peter Erickson, David Schalkwyk, Robert M. Durling, Stanton B. Garner, Christopher Braider, Carolyn Cordery and Karen Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, Shakespeare Quarterly, English Literary Renaissance, ELH and Comparative drama.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.