Robert Laudeley
Impact in
- Microbiology top 5%
- Reproductive tract infections research
- Nephrology top 5%
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Papers in
-
- Reproductive tract infections research 9
-
- Complement system in diseases 4
- Reproductive System and Pregnancy 3
- Co-authors
- Andreas Klos (12 shared papers)Silke Glage (9 shared papers)Ferdinand H. Bahlmann (1 shared paper)Danilo Fliser (1 shared paper)Hermann Haller (2 shared papers)Kirsten de Groot (1 shared paper)Torsten Kirsch (1 shared paper)Carsten Lindschau (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Immunology (3 papers)Vaccines (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Pathogens and Disease (2 papers)Circulation (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Robert Laudeley
14 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Microbiology 106
- Nephrology 81
- Hematology 116
- Immunology 87
- Epidemiology 68
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Laudeley
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Laudeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Laudeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Laudeley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Laudeley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Laudeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Laudeley. The network helps show where Robert Laudeley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Laudeley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 164 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 1 |
About Robert Laudeley
Robert Laudeley is a scholar working on Microbiology, Immunology, Epidemiology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive tract infections research (9 papers), Complement system in diseases (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (3 papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (3 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper) and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (106 citations), Nephrology (81 citations), Hematology (116 citations), Immunology (87 citations) and Epidemiology (68 citations). Robert Laudeley has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Klos, Silke Glage, Ferdinand H. Bahlmann, Danilo Fliser, Hermann Haller, Kirsten de Groot, Torsten Kirsch, Carsten Lindschau, Jan Menne and Michael Mengel. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Vaccines, PLoS ONE, Pathogens and Disease and Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.