Robert Laemmer

976 citations
40 papers · 768 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Laemmer

38 papers receiving 731 citations

Peers

Robert Laemmer
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Ophthalmology 513
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 239
  • Epidemiology 69
  • Neurology 12
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 29
Replace Young Hoon Hwang with:
Young Hoon Hwang South Korea
Luciana M. Alencar United States
Renato Lisboa United States
Zhi Da Soh Singapore
Mauro T. Leite United States
Reinhard Told Austria
Murray Fingeret United States
Lala Ćeklić Switzerland
Gilda Lai Hong Kong
Nicolaas J. Reus Netherlands
Robert Laemmer relative to Young Hoon Hwang South Korea Young Hoon Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Young Hoon Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Laemmer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Laemmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Laemmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Laemmer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Laemmer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Laemmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Laemmer. The network helps show where Robert Laemmer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Laemmer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Laemmer Line = papers co-authored together Robert Laemmer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010174
2 2007112
3 201685
4 200979
5 201365
6 201435
7 201018
8 201817
9 201817
10 200815
11 201314
12 201312
13 200712
14 201511
15 201710
16 200610
17 201110
18 20109
19 20117
20 20147

About Robert Laemmer

Robert Laemmer is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (29 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (1 paper), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (513 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (239 citations), Epidemiology (69 citations), Neurology (12 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (29 citations). Robert Laemmer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Christian Y. Mardin, Folkert K. Horn, Friedrich E. Kruse, Anselm G M Juenemann, Ralf P. Tornow, W. Schrems, Bettina Hohberger, Werner Adler, Anselm Juenemann and Matthias Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Glaucoma, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Der Ophthalmologe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact