Jonathan Denniss

823 citations
40 papers · 667 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Denniss

39 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers

Jonathan Denniss
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Ophthalmology 596
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 499
  • Epidemiology 88
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 48
  • Biophysics 9
Replace Charles Bosworth with:
Charles Bosworth United States
Victor E. Malinovsky United States
Raviv Katz United States
Anselm G M Juenemann Germany
Varsha Manjunath United States
Γεώργιος Παπαστεργίου Greece
Vincent Michael Patella United States
Shiho Kunimatsu‐Sanuki Japan
Jens Paetzold Germany
Robert Laemmer Germany
Jonathan Denniss relative to Charles Bosworth United States Charles Bosworth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Charles Bosworth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Denniss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Denniss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Denniss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Denniss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Denniss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Denniss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Denniss. The network helps show where Jonathan Denniss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Denniss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Denniss Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Denniss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202097
2 201482
3 201250
4 201035
5 201534
6 201032
7 201330
8 201428
9 201827
10 201427
11 201423
12 201720
13 201616
14 201415
15 201115
16 201715
17 201614
18 202112
19 20148
20 20108

About Jonathan Denniss

Jonathan Denniss is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (32 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (20 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (10 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (596 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (499 citations), Epidemiology (88 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (48 citations) and Biophysics (9 citations). Jonathan Denniss has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Allison M. McKendrick, Andrew Turpin, Andrew T. Astle, David Henson, Vincent Nourrit, Ingo Schießl, Jasleen K. Jolly, Robyn H. Guymer, Frank G. Holz and Zhichao Wu. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Translational Vision Science & Technology, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Optometry and Vision Science and Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact