Robert L. Weber

52 papers receiving 815 citations

Peers

Robert L. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
  • History and Philosophy of Science 98
  • Structural Biology 13
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 108
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 246
  • Theoretical Computer Science 9
Replace William T. Scott with:
William T. Scott United States
Albert Einstein United States
Melba Phillips United States
A. B. Arons United States
Diderik Batens Belgium
P Landsberg United Kingdom
J. S. Trefil United States
Hans Christian von Baeyer United States
Allen L. King United States
Charles H. Holbrow United States
Robert L. Weber relative to William T. Scott United States William T. Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
William T. Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert L. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Weber. The network helps show where Robert L. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert L. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert L. Weber Line = papers co-authored together Robert L. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968188
2 1966176
3
The scientist speculates
1962122
4 196693
5 195459
6 196750
7 200439
8 196332
9 196722
10 200015
11 195115
12 198413
13 196613
14 200113
15 196313
16 20039
17 19928
18 19697
19 19635
20 19645

About Robert L. Weber

Robert L. Weber is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 87 papers that have together received 981 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (4 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (2 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Physics and Engineering Research Articles (2 papers) and Rocket and propulsion systems research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (98 citations), Structural Biology (13 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (108 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (246 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Robert L. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include B. L. van der Waerden, W. D. McElroy, Cecil E. Hall, A. H. Morrish, Jerome S. Gans, Sydney P. Clark, John Warren, John W. Dettman, Paul J. Neiman and J. B. Snider. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Today, American Journal of Physics, Monthly Weather Review, Journal of Aircraft and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact