Robert John Clements

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Robert John Clements
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Molecular Medicine 99
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 226
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 143
  • Developmental Neuroscience 25
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 33
Replace Jennifer Ann McDonough with:
Jennifer Ann McDonough United States
Kyungpyo Park South Korea
Mitsuhiro Morita Japan
Qi Han China
Shahnaz Razavi Iran
Minseok Song South Korea
Huazheng Liang China
Gustavo A. Gonzalez Chile
Jinghui Huang China
Joël Eyer France
Robert John Clements relative to Jennifer Ann McDonough United States Jennifer Ann McDonough's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Jennifer Ann McDonough · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert John Clements

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert John Clements's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert John Clements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert John Clements more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert John Clements

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert John Clements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert John Clements. The network helps show where Robert John Clements may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert John Clements, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert John Clements Line = papers co-authored together Robert John Clements links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011103
2 201774
3 201468
4 201566
5 201563
6 200861
7 201560
8 201658
9 201643
10 201340
11 202036
12 200134
13 201633
14 201729
15 201527
16 202127
17 201826
18 202325
19 202024
20 201823

About Robert John Clements

Robert John Clements is a scholar working on Molecular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Surgery, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (11 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (11 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (10 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (8 papers), Advanced Materials and Mechanics (7 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (5 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (4 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (99 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (226 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (143 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (25 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (33 citations). Robert John Clements has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Ann McDonough, Ernest Johnson Freeman, Elda Hegmann, Naveen Kumar Singhal, Shuo Li, Ernie J. Freeman, Roger B. Gregory, Christopher M. Malcuit, Marianne Estelle Prévôt and Michael A. Sulak. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecular Bioscience, PLoS ONE, Macromolecular Rapid Communications, Experimental Brain Research and Interaction design & architecture(s).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact