Robert J. Smith

428 citations
29 papers · 288 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Robert J. Smith

28 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers

Robert J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 147
  • Ecological Modeling 27
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 44
  • Ecology 70
  • Environmental Chemistry 27
Replace Amber C. Churchill with:
Amber C. Churchill United States
Katherine H. Bannar‐Martin United States
Anca Sârbu Romania
Katherine L. Taylor United States
Marie Emanuelsson Sweden
John R. Cross Australia
Remko Leijs Australia
Colleen A. Hatfield United States
Victoria Sloan United Kingdom
Ching-Yu Huang United States
Robert J. Smith relative to Amber C. Churchill United States Amber C. Churchill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Amber C. Churchill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert J. Smith. The network helps show where Robert J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Robert J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Psychopath in Society
197832
2 201329
3 202126
4 201324
5 202216
6 201316
7 201815
8 201913
9 201613
10 201511
11 201611
12 201710
13 20149
14 20228
15 19738
16 20127
17 20216
18 20206
19
Cryptic diversity in bryophyte soil-banks along a desert elevational gradient
20135
20 19795

About Robert J. Smith

Robert J. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (17 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (6 papers), Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (4 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (3 papers), Climate change and permafrost (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (147 citations), Ecological Modeling (27 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 citations), Ecology (70 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (27 citations). Robert J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Jovan, Lloyd R. Stark, Bruce McCune, Andrew N. Gray, Scott R. Abella, Daniel E. Stanton, Heather T. Root, Linda H. Geiser, Florent Arthaud and Dominique Vallod. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vegetation Science, The Bryologist, American Journal of Botany, The Lichenologist and Journal of Biogeography.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact