Robert Foerster

678 citations
40 papers · 485 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 5
    • Management of metastatic bone disease 8
    • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas 4

Robert Foerster

40 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Robert Foerster
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Oncology 158
  • Dermatology 46
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 151
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 94
Replace Stefano Ursino with:
Stefano Ursino Italy
Toshiko Sakuma Japan
T.B. Johannesen Norway
Izumi Koike Japan
Madoka Morota Japan
Jean-Pierre Malhaire France
Pelayo Besa United States
Michiyo Miyawaki Japan
Berrin Pehlivan Türkiye
Marta Braschi‐Amirfarzan United States
Robert Foerster relative to Stefano Ursino Italy Stefano Ursino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stefano Ursino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Foerster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Foerster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Foerster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Foerster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Foerster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Foerster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Foerster. The network helps show where Robert Foerster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Foerster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Foerster Line = papers co-authored together Robert Foerster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201153
2 201635
3 201531
4 201823
5 202123
6 202122
7 201421
8 201521
9 201320
10 201619
11 201917
12 201416
13 202016
14 201614
15 201514
16 201414
17 202213
18 202213
19 202112
20 20189

About Robert Foerster

Robert Foerster is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 485 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (8 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (4 papers) and Male Breast Health Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Oncology (158 citations), Dermatology (46 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (151 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 citations). Robert Foerster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Debus, Tilman Bostel, Harald Rief, Thomas Brückner, Stefan Rieken, Katja Lindel, Ingmar Schlampp, Nathalie Arians, Christian Rudlowski and D Baaske. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Oncology, Cancers, BMC Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Lung Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact