Robert Foerster

697 citations
42 papers · 511 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Management of metastatic bone disease 9
    • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas 2
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 5
    • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 2

Robert Foerster

41 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Robert Foerster
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 47
  • Oncology 107
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 74
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 102
  • Dermatology 23
Replace Tadashi Hara with:
Tadashi Hara Japan
Komel Khabra United Kingdom
S. Sahraoui Morocco
H Niibe Japan
Douglas G. Gold United States
Pierre‐François Dupré France
Giuseppe Iatì Italy
Jiwon Lim South Korea
Rosa Autorino Italy
Angrit Stachs Germany
Robert Foerster relative to Tadashi Hara Japan Tadashi Hara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Tadashi Hara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Foerster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Foerster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Foerster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Foerster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Foerster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Foerster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Foerster. The network helps show where Robert Foerster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Foerster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Foerster Line = papers co-authored together Robert Foerster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201155
2 201635
3 201534
4 202125
5 201824
6 202124
7 201323
8 201423
9 201523
10 201619
11 201917
12 201416
13 202016
14 201616
15 202215
16 201414
17 201514
18 202213
19 202112
20 20189

About Robert Foerster

Robert Foerster is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management of metastatic bone disease (9 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (5 papers), Male Breast Health Studies (4 papers), Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (2 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (47 citations), Oncology (107 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (74 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (102 citations) and Dermatology (23 citations). Robert Foerster has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jürgen Debus, Tilman Bostel, Harald Rief, Thomas Brückner, Nathalie Arians, Stefan Rieken, Ingmar Schlampp, Katja Lindel, Ken Kudura and Christian Rudlowski. Their work appears in journals such as Radiation Oncology, Cancers, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, British Journal of Radiology and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact