Robert E. Wittes

42 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Robert E. Wittes
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Otorhinolaryngology 177
  • Oncology 922
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 320
  • Neurology 250
  • Genetics 144
Replace R. Wittes with:
R. Wittes United States
Wendy Recant United States
S Hellman United States
Annette Hogg Australia
Gerrit DeBoer Canada
Mario De Lena Italy
John J. Costanzi United States
J R C Sainsbury United Kingdom
James K. Luce United States
Rose J. Papac United States
Robert E. Wittes relative to R. Wittes United States R. Wittes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R. Wittes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Wittes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Wittes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Wittes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Wittes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Wittes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Wittes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Wittes. The network helps show where Robert E. Wittes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Wittes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Wittes Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Wittes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985307
2 2002234
3 1996159
4 1978148
5 1977132
6 1966124
7 198282
8 197880
9 197875
10 197669
11
Phase I and clinical pharmacology studies of intravenous and oral administration of 4-demethoxydaunorubicin in patients with advanced cancer.
198367
12 198049
13 197549
14 199643
15 198736
16 197832
17 197729
18 198529
19 197729
20 198526

About Robert E. Wittes

Robert E. Wittes is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lung Cancer Research Studies (8 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (7 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (6 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (3 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (177 citations), Oncology (922 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (320 citations), Neurology (250 citations) and Genetics (144 citations). Robert E. Wittes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert B. Golbey, Brian Leyland‐Jones, Alfred L. Goldberg, Silvia Marsoni, Peter J. O’Dwyer, Esteban Cvitkovic, Janet Wittes, Mark C. Willingham, Ann Setser and Ira Pastan. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, JAMA, The American Journal of Medicine and The Journal of Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact