Robert E. Scully

2.4k citations
21 papers · 1.6k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Robert E. Scully

21 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Robert E. Scully
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Reproductive Medicine 921
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 648
  • Rheumatology 163
  • Oncology 285
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 326
Replace Naoki Tsukamoto with:
Naoki Tsukamoto Japan
Marjan Rouzbahman Canada
Hilary A. McBride United Kingdom
Robert J. Kurman United States
Emanuela Veras United States
Rosanna Fontanelli Italy
Stuart C. Lauchlan United States
Simona Stolnicu Romania
Nadia Ismiil Canada
Anna Pesci Italy
Robert E. Scully relative to Naoki Tsukamoto Japan Naoki Tsukamoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Naoki Tsukamoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Scully

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Scully's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Scully with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Scully more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Scully

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Scully. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Scully. The network helps show where Robert E. Scully may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Scully, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Scully Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Scully links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993194
2
Terminology of endocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: results of a workshop sponsored by the College of American Pathologists and the National Cancer Institute.
1997179
3 1994175
4 1988113
5 1990106
6 199896
7 199991
8 199579
9 200076
10 199561
11 198758
12 199757
13 199252
14 199751
15 199434
16 199334
17 198433
18 198824
19 199919
20 198818

About Robert E. Scully

Robert E. Scully is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Epidemiology and Rheumatology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (5 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (3 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (3 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers) and Soft tissue tumor case studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (921 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (648 citations), Rheumatology (163 citations), Oncology (285 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (326 citations). Robert E. Scully has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. Young, D A Bell, Philip B. Clement, Dean Daya, Debra A. Bell, Robert H. Young, R. C. Knapp, N. Einhorn, V R Zurawski and K. Sjövall. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, International Journal of Gynecological Pathology, Human Pathology, Gynecologic Oncology and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact