Robert E. Lickliter

92 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Robert E. Lickliter
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Developmental Biology 518
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 763
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 730
  • Sensory Systems 220
  • Pharmacy 183
Replace Annika Paukner with:
Annika Paukner United States
Lisa A. Parr United States
Evan L. MacLean United States
Gene P. Sackett United States
Bridget M. Waller United Kingdom
Masaki Tomonaga Japan
Juliane Kaminski Germany
Lucia Regolin Italy
William A. Mason United States
Sarah Marshall‐Pescini Austria
Robert E. Lickliter relative to Annika Paukner United States Annika Paukner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Annika Paukner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert E. Lickliter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert E. Lickliter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert E. Lickliter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert E. Lickliter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert E. Lickliter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert E. Lickliter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert E. Lickliter. The network helps show where Robert E. Lickliter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert E. Lickliter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert E. Lickliter Line = papers co-authored together Robert E. Lickliter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004266
2 2003142
3 2002138
4 2011124
5 199293
6 199086
7 199078
8 201472
9 200070
10 200664
11 201361
12 198558
13 198952
14 200648
15 200046
16 200946
17 200544
18 200443
19 199433
20 198433

About Robert E. Lickliter

Robert E. Lickliter is a scholar working on Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sensory Systems, having authored 93 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (33 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (23 papers), Primate Behavior and Ecology (21 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (21 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (19 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (16 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (15 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (518 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (763 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (730 citations), Sensory Systems (220 citations) and Pharmacy (183 citations). Robert E. Lickliter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Lorraine E. Bahrick, Ross A. Flom, Hunter G. Honeycutt, Gilbert Gottlieb, Thomas D. Berry, Merry J. Sleigh, Greg D. Reynolds, Christopher Harshaw, Maggie W. Guy and Irina Castellanos. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Psychobiology, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Infant Behavior and Development, Infancy and American Psychologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact