Robert D. Vining

66 papers receiving 794 citations

Peers

Robert D. Vining
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Pharmacology 376
  • Occupational Therapy 28
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 98
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 104
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 38
Replace Joel M. Stevans with:
Joel M. Stevans United States
Kaija A Karjalainen Finland
Carolina Yepes Valencia United States
Maggie E. Horn United States
Kjartan Vibe Fersum Norway
Eric K. Robertson United States
Eduardo Brazete Cruz Portugal
Petra M. M. Saur Germany
Thomas R. Denninger United States
Silvano Ferrari Italy
Robert D. Vining relative to Joel M. Stevans United States Joel M. Stevans's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joel M. Stevans · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Vining

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Vining's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Vining with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Vining more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Vining

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Vining. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Vining. The network helps show where Robert D. Vining may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert D. Vining, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert D. Vining Line = papers co-authored together Robert D. Vining links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201866
2 201259
3 201958
4 201737
5 201533
6 201732
7 201732
8 201328
9 201826
10 202026
11 201123
12 201622
13 201922
14 201519
15 201418
16
An evidence-based diagnostic classification system for low back pain.
201317
17 201817
18 201617
19 201316
20 201716

About Robert D. Vining

Robert D. Vining is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 74 papers that have together received 843 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (36 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (4 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (4 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers) and Shoulder Injury and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (376 citations), Occupational Therapy (28 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (98 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (104 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (38 citations). Robert D. Vining has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Cynthia R. Long, Christine Goertz, Katherine A. Pohlman, Stacie Salsbury (Lyons), Amy L. Minkalis, Maruti Ram Gudavalli, Joan A. G. Walter, Ian D. Coulter, Ting Xia and James W. DeVocht. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, Trials, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Chiropractic & Manual Therapies and Pain Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact