Robert Carley

1.2k citations
27 papers · 721 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Carley

27 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Robert Carley
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Structural Biology 28
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 414
  • Condensed Matter Physics 88
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 122
  • Materials Chemistry 238
Replace Emanuele Pontecorvo with:
Emanuele Pontecorvo Italy
Richard T. Chapman United Kingdom
B. Ressel Italy
M. Müller Germany
M. Krenz Germany
Jonah B. Haber United States
Stefan Sellner Germany
H. Redlin Germany
Christopher Arrell Switzerland
Sergey P. Polyutov Russia
Robert Carley relative to Emanuele Pontecorvo Italy Emanuele Pontecorvo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Emanuele Pontecorvo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Carley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Carley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Carley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Carley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Carley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Carley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Carley. The network helps show where Robert Carley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Carley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Carley Line = papers co-authored together Robert Carley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010106
2 201577
3 201269
4 201367
5 202051
6 201035
7 200933
8 200031
9 200731
10 200529
11 201324
12 200523
13 201223
14 201019
15 201519
16 201617
17 202216
18 200916
19 202011
20 20165

About Robert Carley

Robert Carley is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (8 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (3 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (28 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (414 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (88 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (122 citations) and Materials Chemistry (238 citations). Robert Carley has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Martin Weinelt, Cornelius Gahl, Björn Frietsch, Martin Teichmann, Daniel Brete, K. M. Döbrich, Helen H. Fielding, Wolfgang Freyer, Roland Schmidt and Karsten Reuter. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Science Advances, Nature Communications and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact