Robert C. Ting

33 papers receiving 798 citations

Peers

Robert C. Ting
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Virology 58
  • Immunology 188
  • Parasitology 57
  • Animal Science and Zoology 86
  • Genetics 201
Replace H P Ghosh with:
H P Ghosh Canada
R. Rott United States
Sytske Welling‐Wester Netherlands
Mary Ellen M. Davies United States
Jean-François Conscience Switzerland
Masaharu NAIKI Japan
Rudolf Drzeniek Germany
M. M. Nemes United States
Urs Pauli Switzerland
Walter S. Ceglowski United States
Robert C. Ting relative to H P Ghosh Canada H P Ghosh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
H P Ghosh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Ting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Ting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Ting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Ting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Ting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Ting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Ting. The network helps show where Robert C. Ting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Ting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Ting Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Ting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970218
2 1999103
3 197273
4 201255
5 197050
6 198847
7 197238
8 197935
9 197334
10 197730
11 199128
12 197724
13
Expression of various tumor-specific antigens in polyoma virus-induced tumors.
197222
14 197222
15 197219
16 197618
17 198415
18
Transfer RNA methylases of normal cells, virus-transformed cells, and tumors derived from transformed cells.
197114
19
Survival differences exhibited by normal and transformed rat liver epithelial cell lines in the aggregate form.
197713
20 198513

About Robert C. Ting

Robert C. Ting is a scholar working on Genetics, Immunology, Oncology, Virology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (12 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (7 papers), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (6 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers), HIV Research and Treatment (4 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (4 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (58 citations), Immunology (188 citations), Parasitology (57 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (86 citations) and Genetics (201 citations). Robert C. Ting has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Gallo, Stringner Sue Yang, Theresa May Chin Tan, Ursula A. K. KARA, Szu Hee Lee, Anton F. Steuer, Jay A. Levy, Robertson Parkman, Kenneth K. Takemoto and Mark Manak. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cancer, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Journal of Clinical Microbiology, AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact