Robert C. Marsh

33 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Robert C. Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • History and Philosophy of Science 55
  • Theoretical Computer Science 12
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
  • Genetics 206
  • Philosophy 81
Replace Henry Byerly with:
Henry Byerly United States
Stephen T. Davis United States
K. T. Fann United States
Leslie F. Smith United States
John Collins United States
Jonathan Marks United States
M. Heidelberger United States
Perry Meisel
Nerida F. Ellerton United States
Gertrudis Van de Vijver Belgium
Robert C. Marsh relative to Henry Byerly United States Henry Byerly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Henry Byerly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Marsh. The network helps show where Robert C. Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Robert C. Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert C. Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Robert C. Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1957104
2 197786
3 197283
4 197562
5 197151
6
Logic and Knowledge
201147
7 195740
8 197339
9 199833
10
Four dialectical theories of poetry : an aspect of English neoclassical criticism
196528
11 199822
12 197717
13 200017
14 198516
15 197315
16 198113
17 198012
18 197611
19 195811
20 198110

About Robert C. Marsh

Robert C. Marsh is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (10 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (8 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (3 papers), Slime Mold and Myxomycetes Research (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (55 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations), Genetics (206 citations) and Philosophy (81 citations). Robert C. Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Parmeggiani, Bertrand Russell, Gernot Sander, Abraham Worcel, Arthur C. Danto, P. F. Strawson, Jack Mottahedeh, Gisela Mosig, A.M. Breschkin and J. Voigt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Virology, Journal of Bacteriology, Biochemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact