Robert Baldwin
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Papers in
-
- Potato Plant Research 2
-
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 3
- Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 3
- Co-authors
- J. Tuite (3 shared papers)Martin Stob (3 shared papers)K. G. Gillette (1 shared paper)F. N. Andrews (1 shared paper)R. W. Caldwell (2 shared papers)R. Greasham (1 shared paper)Phil Harter Hidy (1 shared paper)Martin Terry (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Poultry Science (1 paper)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (1 paper)Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)Annals of Surgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert Baldwin
9 papers receiving 602 citations
Robert Baldwin's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Plant Science 449
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
- Cell Biology 107
- Microbiology 30
- Pharmacology 79
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Baldwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Baldwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Baldwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Baldwin. The network helps show where Robert Baldwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Robert Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isolation of an Anabolic, Uterotrophic Compound from Corn infected with Gibberella zeae Hit paper breakdown → | 1962 | 312 |
| 2 | 1977 | 150 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 96 | |
| 4 | 1983 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 53 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1964 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 3 |
About Robert Baldwin
Robert Baldwin is a scholar working on Food Science, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (3 papers), Potato Plant Research (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Fungal Biology and Applications (1 paper) and Plant and fungal interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (449 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Cell Biology (107 citations), Microbiology (30 citations) and Pharmacology (79 citations). Robert Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Tuite, Martin Stob, K. G. Gillette, F. N. Andrews, R. W. Caldwell, R. Greasham, Phil Harter Hidy, Martin Terry, Robert D. Williams and Martin G. Goldner. Their work appears in journals such as Poultry Science, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Nature and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.