Robert Anderssen

4.1k citations
202 papers · 3.3k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Anderssen

194 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Robert Anderssen
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Mathematical Physics 626
  • Numerical Analysis 268
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 291
  • Modeling and Simulation 169
  • Applied Mathematics 377
Replace Andrew Lacey with:
Andrew Lacey United Kingdom
Philip W. Smith United States
Pingwen Zhang China
Jianfeng Lu United States
Jian‐Guo Liu United States
Jinchao Xu United States
J. Douglas Faires United States
James Watt United States
George J. Fix United States
Р. Р. Нигматуллин Russia
Robert Anderssen relative to Andrew Lacey United Kingdom Andrew Lacey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.6×
Andrew Lacey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Anderssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Anderssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Anderssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Anderssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Anderssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Anderssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Anderssen. The network helps show where Robert Anderssen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Anderssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Anderssen Line = papers co-authored together Robert Anderssen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 202 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974140
2 2000103
3 1981100
4 199792
5 197479
6 200477
7 200375
8 199969
9 200167
10 197764
11 197161
12 200457
13 197653
14 197652
15 197551
16 197550
17 199047
18 200144
19 198443
20 200739

About Robert Anderssen

Robert Anderssen is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Geophysics and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 202 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical methods in inverse problems (28 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Food composition and properties (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (13 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (12 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers) and Image and Signal Denoising Methods (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (626 citations), Numerical Analysis (268 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (291 citations), Modeling and Simulation (169 citations) and Applied Mathematics (377 citations). Robert Anderssen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. R. de Hoog, Peter Bloomfield, A.R. Davies, R. J. Loy, P. W. Gras, Markus Hegland, B.G. Osborne, Anthony J. Jakeman, John Cleary and F. Békés. Their work appears in journals such as Inverse Problems, Geophysical Journal International, Numerische Mathematik, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics and Mathematics of Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact