Robert Anderssen

4.1k citations
189 papers · 2.9k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Robert Anderssen

179 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Robert Anderssen
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Mathematical Physics 541
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 265
  • Numerical Analysis 216
  • Applied Mathematics 310
  • Modeling and Simulation 132
Replace Jianfeng Lu with:
Jianfeng Lu United States
Pingwen Zhang China
Andrew Lacey United Kingdom
Philip W. Smith United States
Jian‐Guo Liu United States
Jinchao Xu United States
Peter Deuflhard Germany
George J. Fix United States
Р. Р. Нигматуллин Russia
James Watt United States
Robert Anderssen relative to Jianfeng Lu United States Jianfeng Lu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jianfeng Lu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Anderssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Anderssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Anderssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Anderssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Anderssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Anderssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Anderssen. The network helps show where Robert Anderssen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Anderssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert Anderssen Line = papers co-authored together Robert Anderssen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 189 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974124
2 198199
3 200093
4 199785
5 200473
6 197472
7 199967
8 200364
9 197762
10 197158
11 200155
12 200453
13 197650
14 197647
15 197544
16 197542
17 198442
18 200140
19 201636
20 198436

About Robert Anderssen

Robert Anderssen is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Geophysics and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 189 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Numerical methods in inverse problems (26 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (23 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (13 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (12 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (12 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (10 papers) and Food composition and properties (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (541 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (265 citations), Numerical Analysis (216 citations), Applied Mathematics (310 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (132 citations). Robert Anderssen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include F. R. de Hoog, Peter Bloomfield, A.R. Davies, R. J. Loy, P. W. Gras, Markus Hegland, B.G. Osborne, Anthony J. Jakeman, John Cleary and John Paine. Their work appears in journals such as Inverse Problems, Geophysical Journal International, Mathematics of Computation, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics and Numerische Mathematik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact