Robert A. Skipper

484 citations
17 papers · 296 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Robert A. Skipper

17 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Robert A. Skipper
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • History and Philosophy of Science 189
  • Genetics 98
  • General Decision Sciences 4
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 74
Replace John Beatty with:
John Beatty Canada
L. R. Franklin-Hall United States
Matthew J. Barker Canada
Marshall Abrams United States
Joel Velasco United States
Charles H. Pence United States
David N. Stamos Canada
Emily C. Parke New Zealand
Richard A. Richards United States
Peter Beurton Germany
Robert A. Skipper relative to John Beatty Canada John Beatty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
John Beatty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert A. Skipper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert A. Skipper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert A. Skipper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert A. Skipper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert A. Skipper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert A. Skipper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert A. Skipper. The network helps show where Robert A. Skipper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Robert A. Skipper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert A. Skipper Line = papers co-authored together Robert A. Skipper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200597
2 200250
3 200733
4 199930
5 200424
6 201213
7
REVISITING THE FISHER-WRIGHT CONTROVERSY
20098
8 20078
9 20138
10 20047
11 20065
12 20074
13 20133
14 20043
15
The R.A. Fisher-Sewall Wright controversy in philosophical focus : theory evaluation in population genetics
20001
16 20011
17 20091

About Robert A. Skipper

Robert A. Skipper is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 296 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (7 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Language and cultural evolution (1 paper) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (189 citations), Genetics (98 citations), General Decision Sciences (4 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (27 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (74 citations). Robert A. Skipper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roberta L. Millstein and Michael Dietrich. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Biology & Philosophy, Perspectives on Science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact