Rob Peters

30 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Rob Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 281
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 15
  • Ecological Modeling 31
  • Atmospheric Science 114
  • Insect Science 75
Replace Dwight E. Adams with:
Dwight E. Adams United States
Otto Eckmüllner Austria
Daisuke Kishi Japan
Koen Kramer Netherlands
Anne‐Christine Monnet France
Alexander G. Robinson United Kingdom
Sara C. Díaz Spain
Volker Hammen Germany
Ann E. Camp United States
Taber D. Allison United States
Rob Peters relative to Dwight E. Adams United States Dwight E. Adams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.4×
Dwight E. Adams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rob Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rob Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rob Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rob Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rob Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rob Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rob Peters. The network helps show where Rob Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rob Peters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rob Peters Line = papers co-authored together Rob Peters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997137
2 201883
3 199250
4 199031
5 199628
6 201826
7 201226
8 199525
9 199422
10 199715
11 199715
12
Architecture and development of Mexican beech forest.
199514
13 199814
14 199614
15 199812
16
Architecture and development in Fagus japonica-Fagus crenata forest near Mount Takahara
199011
17 19958
18 20217
19 20217
20 19976

About Rob Peters

Rob Peters is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology and Ecological Modeling, having authored 32 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Forest ecology and management (9 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (7 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (3 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers) and Rural development and sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (281 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (15 citations), Ecological Modeling (31 citations), Atmospheric Science (114 citations) and Insect Science (75 citations). Rob Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Tatsuhiro Ohkubo, Tohru Nakashizuka, Kun Fang Cao, Takeshi Ohkubo, Thomas L. Poulson, Roelof A. A. Oldeman, Thomas F O’Brien, Sisi Zlatanova, William Platt and Adam Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Ecology, Journal of Vegetation Science, EuroChoices, Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy and Journal of Sustainable Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact