Rita L. Smith

956 citations
8 papers · 716 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Rita L. Smith

8 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

Rita L. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Clinical Psychology 308
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 177
  • Applied Psychology 42
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 32
Replace Argero A. Zerr with:
Argero A. Zerr United States
Stephanie Zerwas United States
Rebecca H. Berger United States
Emma Broglia United Kingdom
Sarah Bal Belgium
Rachael D. Reavis United States
Sally Ann Rhea United States
Kathryn Gill United States
Annie Aimé Canada
Wolfgang Ihle Germany
Rita L. Smith relative to Argero A. Zerr United States Argero A. Zerr's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Argero A. Zerr · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita L. Smith. The network helps show where Rita L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita L. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita L. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Rita L. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2011286
2 1993171
3 2018111
4 201647
5 200838
6 200829
7 201420
8 201214

About Rita L. Smith

Rita L. Smith is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper) and Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (308 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (179 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (177 citations), Applied Psychology (42 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (32 citations). Rita L. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Rhea Paul, Bruce F. Chorpita, Chad Ebesutani, Brad J. Nakamura, Lindsay Trent, Eric L. Daleiden, Kelsie H. Okamura, Alyssa Ward, Kimberly D. Becker and John Young. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Behavior Therapy, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact