Rita Forde

489 citations
38 papers · 329 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Rita Forde

34 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers

Rita Forde
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 131
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 84
  • Pharmacy 13
  • Occupational Therapy 6
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 29
Replace Judith Parsons with:
Judith Parsons United Kingdom
Ewa Rzońca Poland
Elizabeth Ann Moore Australia
Manjri Raval Australia
Kleyton Santos de Medeiros Brazil
Andrea Akkad United Kingdom
Hanoon P Pokharel Nepal
Nazanin Rezaei Iran
Joseph Bell United States
George A. Dunn United Kingdom
Rita Forde relative to Judith Parsons United Kingdom Judith Parsons's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Judith Parsons · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita Forde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita Forde's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita Forde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita Forde more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita Forde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita Forde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita Forde. The network helps show where Rita Forde may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita Forde, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita Forde Line = papers co-authored together Rita Forde links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202046
2 201635
3 201828
4 201323
5 201923
6 200617
7 202015
8 202315
9 202111
10 202211
11 202310
12 20229
13 20239
14 20218
15 20237
16 20237
17 20217
18 20236
19 20225
20
[General practitioners, community physicians and hospital physicians--how different are they?].
19965

About Rita Forde

Rita Forde is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health and Speech and Hearing, having authored 38 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (19 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (131 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (84 citations), Pharmacy (13 citations), Occupational Therapy (6 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (29 citations). Rita Forde has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Angus Forbes, Evridiki Patelarou, Jackie A. Sturt, Anne Dornhorst, Anna Brackenridge, Helen R. Murphy, Nick Lewis‐Barned, Ruth Bell, Judith Parsons and Katherine J. Hunt. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, BMJ Open, Midwifery, Patient Education and Counseling and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact