Rita D’Aoust

49 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

Rita D’Aoust
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 24
  • General Health Professions 120
  • Emergency Medical Services 29
Replace Ita Daryanti Saragih with:
Ita Daryanti Saragih Taiwan
Mahin Moeini Iran
Esther Cabrera Spain
Vítor Parola Portugal
Irene Schofield United Kingdom
Ice Septriani Saragih Indonesia
Sharyn Hunter Australia
Liesbeth Geerligs Australia
Carla Gene Rapp United States
Sylvia Määttä Sweden
Rita D’Aoust relative to Ita Daryanti Saragih Taiwan Ita Daryanti Saragih's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Ita Daryanti Saragih · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rita D’Aoust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rita D’Aoust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rita D’Aoust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rita D’Aoust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rita D’Aoust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rita D’Aoust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rita D’Aoust. The network helps show where Rita D’Aoust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rita D’Aoust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rita D’Aoust Line = papers co-authored together Rita D’Aoust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201967
2 201258
3 202035
4 201235
5 201430
6 201327
7 201721
8 201920
9 201619
10 202218
11 201218
12 201917
13 202117
14 202115
15 201514
16 202013
17 202112
18 201912
19 202111
20 201610

About Rita D’Aoust

Rita D’Aoust is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 60 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (9 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (5 papers), Education and Military Integration (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Nursing education and management (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (15 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (24 citations), General Health Professions (120 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (29 citations). Rita D’Aoust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Ponrathi Athilingam, Leway Chen, Meredeth A. Rowe, Kevin E. Kip, Maureen Groër, Hae‐Ra Han, Glenna Brewster, Jan A. Moynihan, Manka Nkimbeng and Yvonne Commodore‐Mensah. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Professional Nursing, Nursing Outlook, Nursing Education Perspectives, Nurse Education Today and Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact